Much of the social studies test hands you a short source — an editorial, a letter, a speech, a campaign flyer, a company statement — and asks not what you remember but what the source is doing. The GED describes this as reading for meaning and analyzing historical events and arguments; the HiSET asks candidates to analyze and evaluate information. Both come down to the same handful of moves, and this material practices each of them on original sources written for the purpose.
The twelve questions go in a deliberate order. First, fact against opinion, twice: once picking the sentence that can be checked (a ridership figure) and once the sentence that is a judgment (a company calling a plant closing "the only responsible choice"). Then the parts of an argument: the main claim of a letter asking the city to keep its pool open later, the piece of evidence that actually supports a claim about a job-training program, and the unstated assumption behind a proposal to lower a speed limit.
The middle of the set works with more than one source. A mill owner and a striking worker describe the same strike in 1894, and the question is why their accounts differ when both may be telling the truth. A farmer's letter from the Dust Bowl years is paired with a population figure, and the question is what the number adds and what it cannot show.
The last questions are about purpose and reliability: a flyer paid for by the companies that would build the road it promotes, a First World War bond poster and the technique it uses, which of four documents is a primary source for the 1918 influenza epidemic, the false-cause error in a letter about streetlights, and which of four accounts of a flood is most reliable for a particular question.
Throughout, sources with an interest are treated fairly: a stake in the outcome is a reason to check a claim, not proof that it is wrong, and no question asks which policy is better.
The flashcards cover fifteen terms — fact, opinion, claim, evidence, assumption, point of view, bias, propaganda, bandwagon, loaded language, primary and secondary source, credibility, hasty generalization and false cause. The written work asks for longer answers on eight new sources, including a policy debate where both sides are set out as their own supporters would put them, and the oral exam asks you to take a source apart aloud, one question at a time.
Zestly is an independent study tool, not affiliated with GED Testing Service or the HiSET program.
Practice material written by Zestly, based on the published descriptions of the GED Social Studies test (Reading for Meaning; Analyzing Historical Events and Arguments) and the HiSET Social Studies subtest. Every source quoted in the questions is invented for practice.
A newspaper editorial about a county bus line reads: "The Route 9 bus carried 412,000 riders last year, up from 350,000 in 2019. Extending it to the east side is the wisest investment the county could make. Anyone who opposes the extension simply does not care about working people. The price is a small one for so large a benefit." Which sentence from the writer can be checked as a fact?
The Route 9 bus carried 412,000 riders last year, up from 350,000 in 2019.
Ridership figures can be checked against the transit agency's records, so the sentence about 412,000 and 350,000 riders is a fact (true or false, it can be verified). Calling the extension the wisest investment and calling the price small are judgments. The sentence about opponents not caring about working people is an opinion about other people's motives, and an unfair one, since people can oppose a project for reasons such as its cost.