Two-variable data is one of the skills College Board lists under Problem-Solving and Data Analysis for the PSAT/NMSQT, and its description asks for two things: fitting models to data, and comparing linear and exponential growth. This material trains both, with the data printed in every question so nothing depends on a picture you cannot see.
The quiz has twelve questions, each on a different move. Two come with a drawn scatterplot as well as the list of points: one asks you to describe the association (direction, and whether it is close to a straight line), the other asks you to pick the best of four lines of fit, where one tempting line matches the first two points exactly and then drifts badly away. Then come a prediction from a line of fit where an observed value sits next to it as a trap, a residual whose sign you must turn into "above" or "below the line", and a slope read with its units, in thousands of dollars.
The second half is about growth. Two tables look alike until you subtract and divide: one rises by the same amount each year, the other by the same factor. A question asks which everyday situation is exponential, one asks what 18,000 and 0.85 mean in a depreciation model, one compares a fixed yearly addition with a percentage growth at two different dates, and one computes a decay three steps ahead, where subtracting a fixed amount is the error on offer. The last question shows a line of fit used far outside its data and asks what went wrong.
The flashcards hold the vocabulary and rules: residual, line of fit, positive and negative association, constant differences against constant ratios, growth and decay factors, extrapolation, and how to read a slope.
The printable written work has eight open problems in the style of the test's own answer-entry questions, with no options to lean on: computing residuals and placing points, classifying tables, judging whether an intercept means anything, compound against simple growth, finding the year one plan overtakes another, a leak that removes a fraction of what remains, an impossible prediction, and two subscriber forecasts.
The oral exam asks one question at a time about the same ideas and wants the reasoning said out loud: why a pattern is linear, what a residual's sign means, what a factor in a formula tells you.
Every situation and data set here is invented for practice, and no question is taken from any published test. A calculator is welcome, as it is on the real test.
Practice material written by Zestly, based on the PSAT/NMSQT Math skill "Two-variable data: models and scatterplots" as described in College Board's Fall 2026 PSAT/NMSQT Student Guide and the Assessment Framework for the Digital SAT Suite (version 3.01, August 2024). All data sets are invented. Zestly is not affiliated with College Board.
An energy analyst recorded, for seven winter weeks, the average outdoor temperature $x$, in degrees Fahrenheit, and a household's natural gas use $y$, in therms: $(30, 118)$, $(35, 104)$, $(40, 93)$, $(45, 80)$, $(50, 69)$, $(55, 55)$, $(60, 44)$. Which statement best describes the association between $x$ and $y$?
A strong negative association that is close to linear
As the temperature rises by 5 degrees, gas use falls by 14, 11, 13, 11, 14 and 11 therms: always down, and by roughly the same amount each time. Falling values mean a negative association, and roughly equal drops for equal steps mean the pattern is close to a straight line. A positive association would need gas use to rise with temperature. A curve that falls faster and faster would show drops that keep growing, which these do not. And the points follow a tight pattern, so there is a clear association.
← Data, Geometry and Trigonometry