Craft and Structure asks a different kind of question from the rest of the Reading section. It is not what the paragraph says — that is Information and Ideas, covered by another material here — but what it is doing, which is a question most readers have never been asked out loud. This material is twelve of them, in the three shapes the test uses.
Four ask about the function of one sentence. The paragraph is printed, the question names a sentence by its position in it, and the options describe jobs rather than content: it states the fact the rest of the paragraph explains; it grants a point before the objection that follows; it offers an explanation the writer is about to weigh against another. The reliable trap in this type is an option that names a job the paragraph really does perform — just in a different sentence from the one you were asked about. Three of the four questions here carry one, and the explanations say so, because recognizing it is the skill.
Four ask about the structure of a whole paragraph in a single line. A long-held view, evidence against it, and a revision that keeps what was true in the old one. A process in order with its one apparently wasteful step justified. Two cases set against each other on the single measure that separates them. A problem with a remedy that reaches part of it. Here the trap is a shape that fits part of the paragraph and not the whole — a figure at the end that looks like a comparison, a rule in the last sentence that looks like a heading — and every one of these four questions carries one.
Four are cross-text: two short passages by two invented researchers, and a question about how the second would answer a specific claim of the first, or about what both would accept. Three of the four turn on interpretation rather than fact — the researchers agree on the count of panels, the literacy figures, the size of the gap, and part company over what those show. Two of the questions include an option the second writer would readily accept and which says nothing about the claim in question; learning to notice that a true, agreeable statement can still be no answer is worth more marks than anything else in this section.
Nothing is reproduced from any published test. Every researcher, town, gallery, archive and estuary here was invented for the purpose, and each question is answerable from the words printed in it.
Every paragraph here was written for this exercise, and each question is answerable from the words printed in it. Some of what has to be read: a bridge at Trellis Reach whose piers "took the water without shifting" while every rebuilt bridge near it has needed repair twice; a ferry timetable that "does save time on paper" and leaves no margin for weather; terraces above Loch Tay that a single sixteenth-century rent roll had made into a vineyard until excavation found oat pollen and no vine pollen at all; Bryn slate left out through a winter "deliberately, to let frost open the bedding planes"; and four pairs of researchers who part company over what a shared fact shows — nine repeated panels from one workshop, a literacy figure a generation after a library was built, a coin from a bank cut through by a later ditch, and a fifth less fish landed by the boats that joined a quota scheme. Zestly is an independent study tool. It is not affiliated with the College Board, which owns the PSAT/NMSQT, and it is not an exam centre.
"Almost every bridge on the Perran estuary was rebuilt after the flood of 1911, and the one at Trellis Reach was not. Its piers were cut from a harder stone, quarried eight miles inland, and they took the water without shifting. The rebuilt bridges nearby, all of them raised on local sandstone, have needed repair twice since." Which choice best describes the function of the FIRST sentence in the writer's paragraph as a whole?
It states the fact that the rest of the paragraph sets out to explain.
Ask what the sentence DOES, not what it says. It reports an oddity — one bridge left standing where the others were rebuilt — and the two sentences after it exist to account for that oddity, first by naming the harder stone and then by contrasting the sandstone of the rest. So its job is to put the fact on the table. Conceding a point is a job no sentence here does; nothing is granted to an opposing view. Naming an explanation to be rejected is likewise a job the paragraph never performs, since no explanation is set aside. And reporting the outcome of the repairs belongs to the LAST sentence — the standing trap in this question type, because the description is accurate about the paragraph and wrong about the sentence named.
Try this quiz →Try this exam →Practice these flashcards →Try this written work →