ACT English — order, transitions and saying it in fewer words

Punctuation and grammar are only half of ACT English. The other half asks whether the sentences are in the right order, whether the right word joins them, whether the writer has used fifteen words where six would do, and whether one sentence sounds like the rest. That is what this material covers, and it covers nothing else: commas and verb forms are handled by the other materials in this category.

Twelve questions. Each quotes a short paragraph with its sentences numbered, so that a question can name one of them without asking the reader to count. The options are whole sentences, whole statements or positions — never punctuation variants.

Three questions ask where a displaced sentence belongs, and none of them can be answered by taste. In each, a single word inside the sentence reaches outside it: a "them" that has to mean the four offices, a "That reduction" that can only mean the cut from twelve menus to three, an "argument" the reader has not yet been shown. Find that word and the position is forced. The explanations also make the second check explicit — that moving a sentence must not orphan a pointing word somewhere else in the paragraph, which is how a repair turns into a new fault.

Two questions ask which sentence may open the paragraph. The wrong answers are good sentences that cannot come first, because each leans on something the reader has not been told: "such a space", "the construction", "the playground", "this success".

Three questions are about wordiness, and they are built so that counting words does not work. In one, the shortest option quietly drops the fact the sentence existed to carry; in another it turns one person's judgment into a flat statement of fact by cutting the person. One option in the set adds a disagreement the original never reports — because a revision may neither drop a fact nor invent one.

Two questions turn on a transition, with the four options expressing four different relations: contrast, result, addition and example. Naming the relation between the two sentences in a single word before looking at the options is the whole method. Two more ask for a replacement that matches the tone of what surrounds it, where one option is too casual and one is inflated, since a sentence can break the register of a paragraph by reaching in either direction.

Twelve flashcards carry the underlying rules. Every person, firm, place and paragraph in the bank is invented.

Zestly is an independent study tool. It is not affiliated with ACT, Inc., which owns the test, and it is not an exam centre.

  • Place a displaced sentence by finding the word inside it that points outside it, rather than by ear
  • Check that moving a sentence has not left a pointing word somewhere else without a referent
  • Recognize why a sentence cannot open a paragraph: a 'such', a definite article, or a pronoun with nothing behind it
  • Cut a wordy sentence without losing a fact, and see why the shortest option is so often the wrong one
  • Reject a revision that adds a meaning the original never carried
  • Name the relation between two sentences — contrast, result, addition, example — before choosing the transition that marks it
  • Match the tone of surrounding prose, avoiding both slang and inflation

Written for the organization-and-style strand of ACT English, following the skills the test's own published description names: the logical order of sentences, transitions between ideas, the elimination of wordiness and redundancy, and consistency of style and tone within a passage. Every paragraph, person, firm and place in the bank is invented for this material, and nothing is taken from any ACT publication or released test. Paragraphs are quoted in full with their sentences numbered inside each question, so the material works as plain text with no separate passage to consult.

Sample question

(1) The Zylos Corporation opened four offices in the northern provinces last spring. (2) The firm now holds the largest share of the northern market. (3) Such rapid growth had seemed impossible to the managers who planned it. (4) Staffing them took five hundred new employees, all hired within a single month. The paragraph does not read smoothly as written. Where should sentence 4 be placed?

See the answer

After sentence 1

The word that settles this is 'them' at the start of sentence 4. It has to point at the four offices, and the offices are the last thing named only at the end of sentence 1, so that is where the sentence belongs. Where it now stands, the nearest plural nouns are the managers and the provinces, and a reader reaching 'staffing them' has to go back and hunt for the referent. Placing it ahead of the opening sentence is worse still, because 'them' would then point at nothing at all: the offices have not been mentioned yet. Placing it after the sentence about market share puts a share of a market in the way, and a market share is not something that can be staffed.

Try this quiz →Practice these flashcards →

← English

↑ ACT