The synthesis question gives you six sources and an hour. Most of what goes wrong in that hour goes wrong before any sentence is written, in the reading — a source overstated, a finding about one group applied to another, a qualifying clause quietly dropped. These ten questions work on exactly that.
They begin with two sources that agree completely about a fact and disagree entirely about what caused it, which is the most common shape a source disagreement takes and the one most often described as "they contradict each other". Then two studies that look incompatible and are not, because they are about school pupils and university students. Then the choice of what to leave out — where the right answer is a source that has simply aged out of relevance, and the two tempting answers are objections that are real and are reasons to attribute a source carefully rather than discard it.
Then attribution itself: which of four sentences represents a cautiously worded source without hardening it. Then a report from a trade association, and what such a source is and is not good for — the answer being neither "useless" nor "authoritative". Then the difference between putting two sources side by side and actually using them together.
The question worth the most is the statistic. A source reports that among households which already owned a bicycle, journeys rose forty per cent; a writer quotes it as "cycling rose forty per cent". Both sentences could be true and only one has been measured, and the clause carrying the whole difference is the one that disappeared. Learning to notice that clause is worth more on this exam than any amount of essay structure.
The set closes with scope, with how a strong essay uses a source that tells against it, and with telling the writer's own reasoning from a restatement of somebody else's.
Every source here is invented and every question says so. No real study, author or publication is quoted.
Zestly is an independent study tool. It is not affiliated with the College Board, which owns the AP examinations, and it is not an exam centre.
Source A (invented) reports: 'Among households that already owned a bicycle, journeys made by bicycle rose 40 per cent in the year after the new lanes opened.' A writer quotes it as: 'Cycling rose 40 per cent after the lanes opened.' What has been lost in the retelling?
Source A (invented): A 2022 report states that urban tree canopy cover in the city of Oakhaven has decreased by 15 percent over the last decade. Source B (invented): A 2022 urban planning editorial argues that the reduction in Oakhaven's tree canopy is a direct result of city council negligence. Both sources agree on the fact of the canopy reduction. What is the specific point of disagreement between these two sources?
Whether the decrease in tree canopy is caused by specific political actions.
The sources agree on the data point but disagree on the causal attribution. The first option is incorrect because both sources accept the decrease. The second option is incorrect because neither source disputes the impact of planning. The fourth option is incorrect because the disagreement is not about the accuracy of the data but the interpretation of the cause.