The synthesis question gives you six sources and a share of one timed essay section: two hours and fifteen minutes for all three essays, including a fifteen-minute reading period. Most of what goes wrong in that time goes wrong before any sentence is written, in the reading — a source overstated, a finding about one group applied to another, a qualifying clause quietly dropped. These ten questions work on exactly that.
They begin with two sources that agree completely about a fact and disagree entirely about what caused it, which is the most common shape a source disagreement takes and the one most often described as "they contradict each other". Then two studies that look incompatible and are not, because they are about school pupils and university students. Then the choice of what to leave out — where the right answer is a source that has simply aged out of relevance, and the two tempting answers are objections that are real and are reasons to attribute a source carefully rather than discard it.
Then attribution itself: which of four sentences represents a cautiously worded source without hardening it. Then a report from a trade association, and what such a source is and is not good for — the answer being neither "useless" nor "authoritative". Then the difference between putting two sources side by side and actually using them together.
The question worth the most is the statistic. A source reports that among households which already owned a bicycle, journeys rose forty percent; a writer quotes it as "cycling rose forty percent". Both sentences could be true and only one has been measured, and the clause carrying the whole difference is the one that disappeared. Learning to notice that clause is worth more on this exam than any amount of essay structure.
The set closes with scope, with how a strong essay uses a source that tells against it, and with telling the writer's own reasoning from a restatement of somebody else's.
Every source here is invented and every question says so. No real study, author or publication is quoted.
Zestly is an independent study tool. It is not affiliated with the College Board, which owns the AP examinations, and it is not an test center.
Practice material written by Zestly, based on the published AP English Language and Composition course framework (synthesis and source use). All sources are invented.
Source A (invented): A 2022 report states that urban tree canopy cover in the city of Oakhaven has decreased by 15 percent over the last decade. Source B (invented): A 2022 urban planning editorial argues that the reduction in Oakhaven's tree canopy is a direct result of city council negligence. Both sources agree on the fact of the canopy reduction. What is the specific point of disagreement between these two sources?
Whether the decrease in tree canopy is caused by specific political actions.
The sources agree on the data point but disagree on its cause: Source B blames council negligence, Source A only reports the decline. The option about whether urban planning policies have any impact is incorrect because neither source questions whether planning affects the environment. The option about statistical accuracy is incorrect because neither source disputes the accuracy of the 15 percent figure. The option asking whether the canopy has actually decreased is incorrect because both sources accept that the canopy shrank.
Try this quiz →Practice these flashcards →
← English Language and Composition
AP® and Advanced Placement® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with and does not endorse Zestly. All questions here are original; nothing reproduces official course or exam material.