Data Interpretation is one of the four science practices in the AP Psychology course framework. It asks for less mathematics than a statistics course but more precision than most students bring to it: calculate a mean or a median from a handful of scores, say what a standard deviation or a percentile rank means, read a correlation coefficient for direction and strength, and interpret a result reported as an effect size or as statistically significant. The Article Analysis Question in the free-response section always includes a statistic from a study, and one point depends on describing correctly what it shows.
This material covers every item on that list with small invented data sets written into the questions themselves, so nothing depends on a chart you cannot see. It trains calculating the mean, median, mode and range; choosing the median when an extreme score pulls the mean; recognizing a bimodal distribution; comparing spread through the standard deviation; the normal curve, with about 68 percent of scores within one standard deviation of the mean and about 95 percent within two; percentile rank as relative standing, not percent correct; positive and negative skew and what they do to the mean; reading correlation coefficients, where the sign gives direction and the absolute value gives strength; describing a scatterplot in words; effect sizes, read with the convention the course framework states (about 0.2 small, 0.3 to 0.7 medium, 0.8 or more large); statistical significance, which means a result is unlikely to be due to chance and not that it is large or important; and regression toward the mean.
Every calculation in the quiz explanations is shown step by step, so a wrong answer can be traced to the step where it went wrong.
Four formats are offered. The quiz has twelve questions, each with its own data. The flashcards drill the terms. The oral exam begins with a short data set to summarize out loud and continues one question at a time through spread, the normal curve, correlation and the difference between significance and effect size, ending with brief feedback. The written work is a printable sheet of eight tasks to answer by hand, from computing and comparing measures of central tendency to explaining why a statistically significant result can still be too small to matter.
The material is based on the Data Interpretation practice in the published AP Psychology course framework, including its October 2025 clarification on effect size and statistical significance. The companion material on research design covers methods and ethics.
Practice material written by Zestly, based on the College Board AP Psychology Course and Exam Description (effective fall 2024, with the October 2025 clarifications), Science Practice 3, Data Interpretation (skills 3.A to 3.C). The effect-size convention (about 0.2 small, 0.3 to 0.7 medium, 0.8 or more large) follows that framework. All data sets are invented.
In an invented study, nine teenagers reported their daily minutes on social media: 20, 25, 30, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50 and 400. Which measure best represents the typical teenager in this group, and why?
The median, 35 minutes, because it is not pulled by the extreme score of 400
Ordered, the nine scores have 35 in the middle, so the median is 35. The mean is (20 + 25 + 30 + 30 + 35 + 40 + 45 + 50 + 400) / 9 = 675 / 9 = 75, which is higher than eight of the nine scores because the single extreme score of 400 pulls it up. The median resists that outlier, so it best describes the typical teenager. The mode is not always the most accurate measure, and the range, 400 - 20 = 380, describes spread, not a typical value.