The other materials in this category mostly take the question types of this domain one at a time. On the real section the Information and Ideas questions come as one block in each module, grouped by skill and ordered from easiest to hardest, so you meet every type in quick succession; this set mixes them so that noticing what is being asked becomes part of the exercise. Ten questions, no two of the same type together, in roughly balanced proportions — three central idea, two detail, two textual evidence, two inference, and one set of results to read.
The types reward different reflexes, and mixing them is what makes the reflexes worth having. A central idea question wants the claim the passage was built to make, which is often a correction of the view stated in its own first sentence. A detail question wants only what is on the page, and is failed most often by a choice that is a reasonable inference rather than a statement — one item here separates a butterfly's departure date from its speed of travel, which are easy to conflate when reading quickly. An inference question wants what follows and nothing more, and includes among its wrong answers a completion that simply restates a fact already given: true, harmless, and wrong after the words "it is therefore fair to say". A textual evidence question wants the finding that would change one's confidence in a claim, which for a comparative claim means whatever rules out the rival explanation. And a set of results wants the comparison the figures actually make — here two figures differ and two are identical, and the identical pair is in the passage precisely to catch a claim built on the wrong comparison.
Two items are worth attention after answering. The screen-and-sleep question asks what weakens a claim that names a mechanism, and the strongest attack is on the mechanism: remove the blue light with a filter, and see whether the effect survives. Its wrong answers include one that supports the claim, one that is merely compatible with it, and one that widens it — three different relationships to a claim, only one of which is damage. The marine reserve question asks the same skill in the supporting direction: the biologist argues the ban rather than the water, so the evidence she needs is that the water behaved identically inside and outside.
Every explanation names the question type first and says what that type asks for, then justifies the key and describes what is wrong with each other choice. Every study, researcher, institution, firm and work here is invented, and no invented finding is attributed to a real organization, journal or university. Nothing is reproduced from any College Board publication, released test, practice test, question bank or scoring guideline. The real section presents some results as graphs; here one question is read from a bar graph and the others give their results in sentences.
Zestly is an independent study tool. It is not affiliated with the College Board, which owns the SAT, and it is not an test center.
Written for this catalog, with no source document. The content is all four skills of the domain (central ideas and details, textual and quantitative command of evidence, inferences), as described publicly by the College Board for the Information and Ideas domain of the SAT Reading and Writing section; every passage, question, option and explanation here is original, and nothing is reproduced from any official publication or released test. Zestly is an independent study tool. It is not affiliated with the College Board, which owns the SAT.
Consider these results. In a study by the Halloway Urban Institute, residents living within walking distance of a park and residents living farther away were asked about their life satisfaction and their physical activity; the graph shows the percentage in each group who reported a high level of each. Which statement do these results support?
Living within walking distance of a park is associated with higher reported life satisfaction.
This is a quantitative evidence question, which asks what the figures will actually bear. Sixty percent against forty percent is a real difference in reported life satisfaction, and the keyed statement reports it as an association, which is as far as figures of this kind reach on their own. The claim about physical activity is contradicted by the numbers, which put both groups at thirty percent — the same figure twice, which is exactly why it is in the passage. Calling thirty percent a majority misreads the figure itself. And making physical activity the main determinant of satisfaction asserts a ranking of causes that nothing in these results addresses.
Try this quiz →Practice these flashcards →
SAT® is a trademark registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with and does not endorse Zestly. All questions here are original and written by us; nothing reproduces official College Board material.