Both exams split this subject into the same two tasks, whatever they call them: reading something and saying what it establishes, and taking a faulty sentence and putting it right. Six questions here do the first, four do the second.
The reading half works the way the real papers do — a short passage printed with the question, and one question about it. A piece about community gardens, where the main idea is the one that covers both halves of what is claimed. A library budget, where the question is what a particular detail establishes rather than what it is. Shop owners, a new parking charge and a fall in trade, where the supported conclusion is the hedged one and the wrong answers reach for motive and for facts that were never given. A word — "clear" — in a sense you would not pick first. A paragraph about a man at a construction site, where his attitude has to be read off the words on the page rather than assumed.
And one that is worth more than the others. A council member points out that cyclists on a road have risen by forty percent since a bike lane opened, and concludes that the lane is making the road safer. There is real evidence there; it simply measures something other than what is being claimed. Separating a claim from the evidence offered for it is examined on both papers, and it is the skill the essay is marked on too.
The four editing questions cover the rules that recur: a comma splice, subject-verb agreement across a long intervening phrase, parallel structure in a list, and choosing the transition the logic requires. Each shows the faulty sentence and asks which described repair is right, rather than offering four versions of the same sentence differing by a comma, so that the focus stays on the rule itself. The rule being tested survives the change; what is lost is the scan of near-identical lines, and for that use the free practice tests both organizations publish.
Every passage is about adult life — work, housing, local government, a building site, a council meeting. Nothing here is written down to anyone.
Zestly is an independent study tool. It is not affiliated with GED Testing Service or with PSI Services, and it is not a test center.
Written for this exercise. From the bank: "Since the bike lane opened on Mill Road last spring, the number of cyclists counted there each morning has risen by forty percent. The lane is clearly making the road safer." The question asks what the figure measures against what the second sentence claims.
Read the following passage: 'Community gardens in urban areas provide more than just fresh produce. They serve as vital social hubs where neighbors from diverse backgrounds interact, fostering a sense of belonging. Furthermore, these green spaces help reduce the heat island effect common in concrete-heavy cities, improving air quality and lowering cooling costs for nearby residents. While the initial setup requires coordination, the long-term health and environmental benefits make them a valuable asset for any neighborhood.' Which statement best expresses the main idea of this account?
Community gardens offer significant social and environmental advantages to urban residents.
The passage lists multiple benefits, including social cohesion and environmental improvements, which supports the conclusion that these gardens provide broad advantages. The option about lowering the cost of living focuses only on cost, ignoring social benefits. The option about finding enough space mentions a challenge not discussed as a primary focus. The option naming neighbors from diverse backgrounds as the only beneficiaries incorrectly limits the beneficiaries.
Try this quiz →Try this exam →Practice these flashcards →Try this written work →
← Language arts — reading and writing
GED® is a registered trademark of the American Council on Education, used under license by GED Testing Service LLC. HiSET® is a registered trademark of PSI Services LLC. Zestly is not affiliated with or endorsed by either; all practice material here is original.