Three rules make up most of what is left of Standard English Conventions once verbs and punctuation are accounted for, and all three are the kind that an ear trained on speech gets wrong. This material is twelve questions, four on each.
Pronouns first. A pronoun has to find the noun it stands for, and the noun it stands for is rarely the nearest one: in "each of the three drafts has ____ own strengths" the pronoun answers to "each", which is singular, and the verb beside it has already said so. Case is the other half. After a preposition the objective form is required, and a compound object ("between Marcus and ____") is only there to make you forget it — drop the other name and the answer is obvious. One question turns on the place where the preposition rule gives way: in "divided among ____ had signed the petition", what follows the preposition is a whole clause, and the pronoun is that clause's subject.
Modifiers second. An opening participial phrase attaches to whatever the main clause makes its subject, which is why "Having studied the tide tables for a week, the crossing was attempted" has a crossing reading tide tables. The repair is not to move the phrase but to give the main clause a subject that can do what the phrase describes. Each of these questions offers a rewrite that is perfectly grammatical and says something else — the party studying the tables after the crossing rather than before, a mayor who hung the portrait himself — because a fix that quietly changes the meaning is the trap this type is built around. Two of the four turn on a limiting word instead: "only" and "nearly" limit whatever stands directly after them, and the stem states what the writer meant so that the question is about placement rather than about guesswork.
Parallel form last, and it is the most mechanical of the three. Whatever follows "not only" fixes what must follow "but also". Whatever stands on the left of "rather than" fixes what stands on the right. Three items in a list hanging off one "to" must all be bare verbs. The test is always the same: read the sentence back with each item in turn, and listen for the one that will not sit in the pattern the others have set.
Every explanation names the fault rather than appealing to what sounds right, and says for each wrong option which fault it is. Nothing here rests on a usage careful writers dispute: there is no singular-they question in the bank. All the sentences were written for this exercise, and nothing is reproduced from any published test.
All twelve sentences were written for this exercise and each stands alone. Among them: "Each of the three drafts submitted to the prize committee has ____ own strengths"; "The dean divided the archive work between Marcus and ____"; "The prize money was to be divided among ____ had signed the original petition"; "Having studied the tide tables for a week, the crossing was attempted at four in the morning"; "Painted in 1876 and hung in the town hall for a century, the mayor described the portrait as the building's one treasure"; "The restorers nearly spent four months on the ceiling alone"; and "The new bridge is not only cheaper to maintain than the one it replaced but also ____." Zestly is an independent study tool. It is not affiliated with the College Board, which owns the PSAT/NMSQT, and it is not an test center.
"Having studied the tide tables for a week, the crossing was attempted at four in the morning." Which choice best corrects the writer's sentence?
Having studied the tide tables for a week, the party attempted the crossing at four in the morning.
An opening participial phrase attaches itself to whatever the main clause makes its subject, and in the sentence as printed that subject is "the crossing" — which cannot study a tide table. The repair is to give the main clause a subject that can, and the option with "the party attempted the crossing" does exactly that while leaving the order of events alone. Adding "by the party" at the end does not help: the subject of the clause is still the crossing, so the participle still hangs on it. Moving the phrase to the end changes nothing either, for the same reason. The option that opens with "Having attempted the crossing" is perfectly grammatical and says something else entirely — it has the party studying the tables after the crossing rather than before it.
Try this quiz →Try this exam →Practice these flashcards →Try this written work →
← Writing — expression and conventions
PSAT/NMSQT® is a registered trademark of the College Board and National Merit Scholarship Corporation, which are not affiliated with and do not endorse Zestly. All questions here are original; nothing reproduces official test material.