Ten sentences, each with a blank and four forms to choose between, and one for each of ten rules in this half of the domain. Unlike the punctuation questions in the companion material, these can use the real test's own format: "was", "were", "has been" and "have been" are four different words, so nothing is lost in translation.
The agreement questions are built around the four situations in which the ear gives the wrong answer. A subject separated from its verb by two prepositional phrases leaves a plural noun sitting immediately before the blank, and deleting everything from "of" onward is what settles it. A subject that follows its verb, in a sentence opening "Among the various artifacts", hides behind an inversion. A compound subject joined by "nor" takes its number from whichever element is nearer, which is a rule with no logic behind it and has to be known. And a collective noun takes the singular when the body acts as one — a committee issuing a single report — with the sentence's own later "its" confirming it. That last question carries a note worth reading: where a sentence describes the members acting separately rather than the body acting together, the plural becomes defensible, and the distinction is real rather than pedantic.
The rest cover what the domain calls form and structure. A tense question sets "currently" against a clause about the previous year. A participle question uses an irregular verb, because with a regular one the participle and the simple past are the same word and there is no question to ask; the test is whether a form could stand alone after the subject with no helper, and if it could, it is the simple past and does not belong after "had". A pronoun question turns on "series", singular however many lectures it contains, with the plural "lectures" in the sentence to tempt agreement. A case question puts a pronoun in a compound object, where the more formal-sounding form is the wrong one. A modifier question makes the blank supply the subject that the opening phrase has to describe. And a parallelism question puts the blank third in a list of three verbs.
Every explanation names the rule, points at the words in the sentence that trigger it — the true subject, the antecedent, the other items in the list — and says what a reader would have been thinking to choose each wrong form. Every person, institution and firm in these sentences is invented. Nothing is reproduced from any College Board publication, released test, practice test, question bank or scoring guideline.
Zestly is an independent study tool. It is not affiliated with the College Board, which owns the SAT, and it is not an test center.
"The planning committee _________ its report to the board every spring, and the board publishes a summary of it in June." Which choice completes the writer's sentence so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
"Having finished the lengthy report, _________ finally took a well-deserved break from the office environment." Which choice completes the writer's sentence so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
the researcher
The introductory participial phrase 'Having finished the lengthy report' must modify the subject of the main clause. 'The researcher' is the logical subject who finished the report. The other options create a dangling modifier because they do not identify the person who performed the action.
Try this quiz →Practice these flashcards →
← Standard English Conventions
SAT® is a trademark registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with and does not endorse Zestly. All questions here are original and written by us; nothing reproduces official College Board material.